Madhav Copper Legal & Regulatory
M Tek Copper paid NSE a Rs. 11,800 penalty for late XBRL voting-results filing. The company confirmed rectification and no material operational impact.
- Value
- ₹0.00 Cr
ALFA Filings
Every announcement, straight from the exchange
Every Madhav Copper legal & regulatory announcement on NSE and BSE, newest first, each with its own page.
Time
8 announcements
M Tek Copper paid NSE a Rs. 11,800 penalty for late XBRL voting-results filing. The company confirmed rectification and no material operational impact.
M Tek Copper disclosed an NSE fine of ₹11,800 for delayed XBRL voting-results filing. The company has rectified the non-compliance under Regulation 44(3) LODR.
M Tek Copper received an adjudication order from SEBI. The company was imposed a monetary penalty of ₹10.00 Lakhs for delayed disclosure.
M Tek Copper paid a penalty of ₹3.77 lakh to NSE. The fine was for non-compliance regarding Board constitution.
M Tek Copper Limited received a ₹0.08 Crore NSE fine for board composition non-compliance. The company has since rectified the issue by appointing a sixth director.
Madhav Copper Limited has filed an appeal against a GST adjudication order (Form GST DRC-07) issued by CGST/SGST authorities. The company believes the order will not have a material impact on its financial or operational activities. This filing updates a previous disclosure from January 2026 regarding the receipt of the initial order.
Madhav Copper Limited (MCL) filed an appeal on March 10, 2026, against a GST assessment order issued under Section 74. The company stated that the order is not expected to have a material impact on its financial or operational activities. Investors should note this as a routine regulatory update regarding tax litigation.
Madhav Copper Limited provided an update regarding its appeal against a tax penalty order under Section 270A. The company received a hearing notice from the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and filed its response on March 23, 2026. Management does not expect any material adverse impact from this sub judice matter.